I let the airspeed increase to 35mph and found very good aileron response. Rolls from left to right to 30 degrees either way while keeping the ball centered were very positive. Quick stick movements of full aileron left to right without waiting for a bank to increase more than about 5 degrees showed definite and positive aileron response. This latest was a good demonstration of aileron control one can expect when at a three point landing is made in strong and turbulent cross winds are encountered.
Now at 35mph there is strong aileron authority.
Next test was to set rpms at 1550 rpm and continue with slow deceleration to minimum airspeed or stall which ever occurs first.
Very surprisingly the airspeed bottomed at 27 mph at full back stick. 27 miles per hour!!! The rate of climb meter showed a steady 200 fpm down but the plane would not stall. Keeping the ball centered continue controlled flight. There was still some aileron control remaining, but no longer strong. Using coordinated rudder and aileron I was still able to make turns left and right to any heading I wished.
On the upper end of speed at cruise I wished to determine if increased drag there would be a penalty. Using routine 4 way gps testing techniques the speed at 2350 rpm (my cross country cruise rpm) at 4,000 msl and 43 degrees F the following:
102 average mph. This very closely matched the speeds of the first tests after VGs, where the speed was 102.5 mph. It therefore looks like a drag penalty of 1.5 to 2 mph at cruise speeds.
The recovery was without incident as the pitch down was straight ahead. I did not observe the altitude loss. In due time I will perform it again with more care to watch rate of climb or loss just prior to stall break or the altitude loss. Later I practiced stall approaches at 1500 rpm and it again repeated to be 27 mph indicated air speed. and 1000 rpm and again it repeated to be 31.5 rpm. In these last two I had full back stick with constant rpm would not get a stall break. Tom Marsom, Wisconsin, USA.
Commentary